PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZM vs. RNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZM vs. RNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZM achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly lower than RNG's 93.23% return.


ZM

1D
4.06%
1M
10.24%
6M
4.31%
YTD
11.33%
1Y
35.37%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
-23.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.51%

RNG

1D
4.00%
1M
39.02%
6M
115.63%
YTD
93.23%
1Y
136.16%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
-26.90%
10Y*
9.33%
ALL TIME*
9.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$166.64M$110.87M$87.41M
$292.76M$286.72M$412.83M

ZM vs. RNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZM
Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
11.33%5.73%13.49%6.16%-63.17%-45.48%395.77%4.68%
RNG
RingCentral, Inc.
93.23%-17.51%3.12%-4.10%-81.10%-50.56%124.68%61.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ZM and RNG is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.58

The correlation between ZM and RNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZM:

$28.17B

RNG:

$4.80B

EPS

ZM:

$6.81

RNG:

$1.25

PE Ratio

ZM:

14.10

RNG:

44.65

PS Ratio

ZM:

5.92

RNG:

1.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZM:

$4.93B

RNG:

$2.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZM:

$3.82B

RNG:

$1.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZM:

$1.90B

RNG:

$300.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZM vs. RNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZM
ZM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

RNG
RNG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
RNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNG Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZM vs. RNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZMRNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.33

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

4.08

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

9.42

-6.79

ZM vs. RNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZM Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the RNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZM and RNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZM vs. RNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZM drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, smaller than the maximum RNG drawdown of -95.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZM and RNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZMRNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.27%

-95.15%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.92%

-29.32%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.92%

-48.57%

+22.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.19%

-92.36%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.10%

-87.41%

+4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.23%

-42.86%

-20.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.32%

12.69%

-1.37%

Volatility

ZM vs. RNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) is 11.09%, while RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) has a volatility of 28.56%. This indicates that ZM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZMRNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.09%

28.56%

-17.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.10%

59.45%

-25.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.66%

75.16%

-31.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.55%

64.53%

-19.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.28%

56.51%

-2.23%

Dividends

ZM vs. RNG - Dividend Comparison

ZM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


Financials

ZM vs. RNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zoom Video Communications, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ZM vs. RNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zoom Video Communications, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ZM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported a gross profit of 964.72M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.9%.

RNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 472.31M and revenue of 657.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.

ZM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported an operating income of 310.47M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.

RNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.29M and revenue of 657.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

ZM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Zoom Video Communications, Inc. reported a net income of 425.68M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 34.4%.

RNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of 39.12M and revenue of 657.01M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZM and RNG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNG has higher volatility (28.56%) compared to ZM (11.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZM dropped -90.27% vs RNG's -95.15%.

RNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZM and RNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer