ZINC vs. CCEF

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

ZINC (Zacks Income ETF) and CCEF (Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF) are both Dividend funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ZINC charges 0.55%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for CCEF.

Performance

ZINC vs. CCEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ZINC

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 2.88%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CCEF

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -1.21%
• 6M: 2.11%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 1Y: 10.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	$121.81K	$110.01K	$102.18K
ZINC Zacks Income ETF	$209.04K	$419.51K	$225.91K

ZINC vs. CCEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ZINC Zacks Income ETF	5.72%
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ZINC and CCEF is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2026	0.13

Return for Risk

ZINC vs. CCEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZINC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCEF

CCEF Risk / Return Rank: 51
CCEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CCEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CCEF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CCEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CCEF Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZINC vs. CCEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Income ETF (ZINC) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZINC	CCEF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.30	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.98	—

Drawdowns

ZINC vs. CCEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZINC drawdown since its inception was -1.94%, smaller than the maximum CCEF drawdown of -13.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZINC and CCEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZINC	CCEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-13.25%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-2.12%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-1.32%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZINC	CCEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.45%	8.36%	+2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.45%	10.66%	-0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.45%	10.66%	-0.21%

ZINC vs. CCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZINC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CCEF's 2.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZINC vs. CCEF - Dividend Comparison

ZINC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CCEF Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF	8.11%	8.08%	6.55%
ZINC Zacks Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZINC and CCEF in my portfolio?

ZINC and CCEF have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZINC or CCEF?

On fees, ZINC is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZINC or CCEF?

ZINC is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 2.74% for CCEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZINC or CCEF?

CCEF has the higher dividend yield at 8.11%, compared with 0.00% for ZINC.

What is the main difference between ZINC and CCEF?

They also come from different issuers: Zacks and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZINC and 2.74% for CCEF.