ZIG vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
ZIG and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZIG is a passively managed fund by Acquirers Funds that tracks the performance of the Acquirer's Index. It was launched on May 15, 2019. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both ZIG and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZIG or SCHG.
Key characteristics
| ZIG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.01% | 22.49% |
| 1Y Return | 23.19% | 34.99% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.45% | 10.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.43% | 19.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.20 | 2.03 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.44% | 17.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.14% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.82% | -4.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIG and SCHG is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ZIG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ZIG achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 22.49% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZIG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIG has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZIG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZIG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ZIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than SCHG's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIG Acquirers Fund | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.26% | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.27% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
ZIG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIG drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIG and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZIG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Acquirers Fund (ZIG) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.61%. This indicates that ZIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.