ZGFIX vs. PGVFX
ZGFIX (American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund) and PGVFX (Polaris Global Value Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ZGFIX returned 5.56%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for PGVFX. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ZGFIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PGVFX.
Performance
ZGFIX vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGFIX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than PGVFX's 20.95% return.
ZGFIX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 9.58%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.58%
PGVFX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 1Y
- 39.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ZGFIX vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGFIX American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund | 0.98% | 18.56% | 7.83% | 19.38% | -18.04% | 18.58% | 16.72% | 28.13% | -4.07% |
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund | 20.95% | 27.01% | 5.33% | 14.76% | -12.00% | 15.38% | 6.65% | 22.83% | -11.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGFIX and PGVFX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ZGFIX and PGVFX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZGFIX vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank
ZGFIX
PGVFX
ZGFIX vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZGFIX | PGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.55 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 4.21 | -3.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | 15.79 | -14.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZGFIX vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGFIX drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum PGVFX drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGFIX and PGVFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGFIX | PGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.51% | -68.09% | +39.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.14% | -8.76% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -12.53% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -27.58% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -0.86% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -11.24% | +6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 2.34% | +2.72% |
Volatility
ZGFIX vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison
American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) at 3.42%. This indicates that ZGFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZGFIX | PGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 3.42% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 10.71% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 12.46% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 13.84% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 15.63% | +0.91% |
ZGFIX vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZGFIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZGFIX vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison
ZGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than PGVFX's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund | 4.28% | 5.17% | 5.65% | 1.68% | 3.55% | 4.05% | 1.55% | 3.69% | 3.39% | 1.50% | 1.32% | 1.26% |
ZGFIX American Beacon Ninety One Global Franchise Fund | 7.92% | 8.00% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.13% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZGFIX and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZGFIX has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to PGVFX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZGFIX dropped -28.51% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.
PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZGFIX and PGVFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer