PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGVFX vs. GWPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGVFX vs. GWPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGVFX achieves a 20.95% return, which is significantly higher than GWPFX's 7.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PGVFX has underperformed GWPFX with an annualized return of 11.05%, while GWPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.66% annualized return.


PGVFX

1D
0.38%
1M
0.65%
6M
13.01%
YTD
20.95%
1Y
39.07%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
11.05%
ALL TIME*
8.07%

GWPFX

1D
2.10%
1M
-2.63%
6M
5.21%
YTD
7.32%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
12.66%
ALL TIME*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PGVFX vs. GWPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
20.95%27.01%5.33%14.76%-12.00%15.38%6.65%22.83%-12.64%20.60%
GWPFX
American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6
7.32%20.46%20.08%28.78%-26.99%18.56%25.39%27.19%-6.61%25.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PGVFX and GWPFX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between PGVFX and GWPFX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGVFX vs. GWPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGVFX
PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GWPFX
GWPFX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GWPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GWPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGVFX vs. GWPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) and American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGVFXGWPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.18

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

1.32

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.79

5.44

+10.35

PGVFX vs. GWPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGVFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the GWPFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGVFX and GWPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGVFX vs. GWPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGVFX drawdown since its inception was -68.09%, which is greater than GWPFX's maximum drawdown of -52.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGVFX and GWPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGVFXGWPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.09%

-52.51%

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-11.78%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.53%

-19.40%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.58%

-34.15%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.26%

-52.51%

+11.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-3.87%

+3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.24%

-5.70%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.84%

-0.50%

Volatility

PGVFX vs. GWPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) is 3.42%, while American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that PGVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGVFXGWPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

4.58%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

12.91%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

15.79%

-3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

18.47%

-4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

41.64%

-26.01%

PGVFX vs. GWPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGVFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GWPFX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGVFX vs. GWPFX - Dividend Comparison

PGVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than GWPFX's 5.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWPFX
American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6
5.36%5.75%5.81%1.60%9.84%3.39%3.41%5.77%6.18%3.35%4.30%4.75%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
4.28%5.17%5.65%1.68%3.55%4.05%1.55%3.69%3.39%1.50%1.32%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGVFX and GWPFX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWPFX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to PGVFX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGVFX dropped -68.09% vs GWPFX's -52.51%.

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGVFX and GWPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer