ZGFIX vs. MFWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX).
ZGFIX is managed by Ninety One. It was launched on Dec 10, 2017. MFWIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Performance
ZGFIX vs. MFWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZGFIX vs. MFWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGFIX Ninety One Global Franchise Fund | -10.36% | 18.56% | 7.83% | 19.38% | -18.04% | 18.58% | 16.72% | 28.13% | -4.07% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | -0.47% | 15.70% | 4.25% | 10.52% | -10.62% | 8.59% | 9.63% | 18.49% | -6.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGFIX achieves a -10.36% return, which is significantly lower than MFWIX's -0.47% return.
ZGFIX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- —
MFWIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZGFIX vs. MFWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZGFIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MFWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZGFIX vs. MFWIX — Risk / Return Rank
ZGFIX
MFWIX
ZGFIX vs. MFWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGFIX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.29 | -1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 1.77 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.25 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 1.59 | -1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 6.26 | -5.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGFIX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.29 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.52 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.71 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGFIX and MFWIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZGFIX vs. MFWIX - Dividend Comparison
ZGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than MFWIX's 8.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGFIX Ninety One Global Franchise Fund | 8.93% | 8.00% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.13% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 8.81% | 8.77% | 9.36% | 3.98% | 2.94% | 10.71% | 7.53% | 4.70% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 1.40% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
ZGFIX vs. MFWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGFIX drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum MFWIX drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGFIX and MFWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGFIX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.51% | -33.01% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.14% | -6.85% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -20.22% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.49% | -6.50% | -5.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -3.83% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 1.74% | +1.80% |
Volatility
ZGFIX vs. MFWIX - Volatility Comparison
Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) at 3.04%. This indicates that ZGFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZGFIX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.04% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 5.25% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 8.85% | +5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 9.09% | +6.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 9.60% | +7.05% |