MFWIX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
MFWIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
MFWIX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFWIX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | -0.47% | 15.70% | 4.25% | 10.52% | -10.62% | 8.59% | 9.63% | 18.49% | -6.96% | 15.00% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFWIX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MFWIX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
MFWIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFWIX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFWIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFWIX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
MFWIX
FGIAX
MFWIX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFWIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 1.75 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 2.26 | -0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 2.61 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.26 | 12.12 | -5.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFWIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 1.75 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.80 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.58 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.42 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFWIX and FGIAX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MFWIX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
MFWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, less than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 8.81% | 8.77% | 9.36% | 3.98% | 2.94% | 10.71% | 7.53% | 4.70% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 1.40% | 4.59% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
MFWIX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFWIX drawdown since its inception was -33.01%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFWIX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFWIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.01% | -49.35% | +16.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.85% | -8.29% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.22% | -21.08% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.36% | -38.02% | +14.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.50% | -3.78% | -2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -7.22% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 1.78% | -0.04% |
Volatility
MFWIX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) is 3.04%, while Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that MFWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFWIX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 4.05% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.25% | 7.09% | -1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.85% | 12.28% | -3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.09% | 13.08% | -3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.60% | 15.17% | -5.57% |