PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZGFIX vs. GCCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZGFIX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZGFIX achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 28.83% return.


ZGFIX

1D
-1.06%
1M
1.81%
YTD
-3.73%
6M
-2.34%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
10.51%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*

GCCHX

1D
1.60%
1M
7.08%
YTD
28.83%
6M
29.87%
1Y
82.70%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZGFIX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ZGFIX
Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
-3.73%18.56%7.83%19.38%-18.04%18.58%16.72%28.13%-4.07%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
28.83%39.25%-25.63%-6.85%-10.39%21.84%42.82%27.36%-16.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ZGFIX and GCCHX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2018

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between ZGFIX and GCCHX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZGFIX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZGFIX
ZGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ZGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCHX
GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZGFIX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZGFIXGCCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.57

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

7.41

-7.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.58

24.13

-23.55

ZGFIX vs. GCCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZGFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the GCCHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZGFIX and GCCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZGFIXGCCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

3.70

-3.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.15

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.44

+0.11

Drawdowns

ZGFIX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZGFIX drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum GCCHX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGFIX and GCCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZGFIXGCCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.51%

-54.32%

+25.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.14%

-11.76%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-52.03%

+38.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.19%

-54.32%

+27.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.02%

0.00%

-6.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-13.91%

+8.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

3.61%

+1.04%

Volatility

ZGFIX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) is 2.97%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that ZGFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZGFIXGCCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

6.47%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

16.31%

-7.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.39%

23.57%

-12.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

26.95%

-11.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

25.15%

-8.57%

ZGFIX vs. GCCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZGFIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCHX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZGFIX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison

ZGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.31%, more than GCCHX's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
1.17%1.51%0.66%0.96%2.24%25.43%5.42%4.03%2.62%3.43%
ZGFIX
Ninety One Global Franchise Fund
8.31%8.00%0.23%0.33%0.37%0.13%0.38%0.89%0.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZGFIX and GCCHX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCHX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to ZGFIX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZGFIX dropped -28.51% vs GCCHX's -54.32%.

GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZGFIX and GCCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer