PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCCHX vs. GIDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCCHX vs. GIDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCHX achieves a 26.80% return, which is significantly higher than GIDGX's 11.46% return.


GCCHX

1D
-0.93%
1M
4.94%
YTD
26.80%
6M
28.89%
1Y
83.81%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*

GIDGX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.84%
YTD
11.46%
6M
12.60%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCCHX vs. GIDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
26.80%39.25%-25.63%-6.85%-10.39%21.84%42.82%27.36%-16.35%26.15%
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
11.46%15.74%20.59%17.92%-12.75%18.46%8.41%19.97%-8.26%11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GCCHX and GIDGX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2017

0.74

The correlation between GCCHX and GIDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCCHX vs. GIDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCHX
GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GIDGX
GIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
GIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
GIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCCHX vs. GIDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCCHXGIDGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.53

2.70

+0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.22

3.79

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.52

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.03

3.68

+3.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.91

17.75

+5.17

GCCHX vs. GIDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the GIDGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCHX and GIDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCCHXGIDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53

2.70

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.86

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.69

-0.25

Drawdowns

GCCHX vs. GIDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCHX drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, which is greater than GIDGX's maximum drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCHX and GIDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCCHXGIDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.32%

-31.63%

-22.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-7.14%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.03%

-14.69%

-37.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.32%

-20.39%

-33.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

0.00%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-3.87%

-10.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

1.48%

+2.13%

Volatility

GCCHX vs. GIDGX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) at 2.46%. This indicates that GCCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCCHXGIDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

2.46%

+3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.27%

7.65%

+8.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.58%

9.67%

+13.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.94%

12.99%

+13.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.15%

14.16%

+10.99%

GCCHX vs. GIDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCHX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than GIDGX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCCHX vs. GIDGX - Dividend Comparison

GCCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than GIDGX's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
1.19%1.51%0.66%0.96%2.24%25.43%5.42%4.03%2.62%3.43%0.00%0.00%
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
5.54%5.92%12.06%4.32%8.89%8.41%1.99%4.85%5.67%3.35%2.97%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCCHX and GIDGX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCHX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to GIDGX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCCHX dropped -54.32% vs GIDGX's -31.63%.

GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCCHX and GIDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer