ZGFIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
ZGFIX is managed by Ninety One. It was launched on Dec 10, 2017. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
ZGFIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZGFIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGFIX Ninety One Global Franchise Fund | -10.36% | 18.56% | 7.83% | 19.38% | -18.04% | 18.58% | 16.72% | 28.13% | -4.07% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -1.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZGFIX achieves a -10.36% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return.
ZGFIX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- —
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZGFIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZGFIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZGFIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
ZGFIX
CSUAX
ZGFIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZGFIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.63 | -1.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 2.17 | -1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.32 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 2.36 | -2.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 10.32 | -9.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZGFIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.63 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.61 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZGFIX and CSUAX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZGFIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
ZGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGFIX Ninety One Global Franchise Fund | 8.93% | 8.00% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.13% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
ZGFIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZGFIX drawdown since its inception was -28.51%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZGFIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZGFIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.51% | -52.20% | +23.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.14% | -7.98% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -20.45% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.49% | -4.38% | -8.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -8.49% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 1.83% | +1.71% |
Volatility
ZGFIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Ninety One Global Franchise Fund (ZGFIX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that ZGFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZGFIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.26% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 6.89% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 11.48% | +2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 12.89% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 14.89% | +1.76% |