ZECP vs. TDVG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ZECP (Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZECP returned 14.80%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ZECP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

ZECP vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than TDVG's 10.93% return.

ZECP

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 1Y: 18.64%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.36%

TDVG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.09%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	$2.11M	$3.07M	$2.63M
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	$1.64M	$1.62M	$1.64M

ZECP vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	8.60%	15.03%	17.32%	13.88%	-13.41%	7.62%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	10.93%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-10.15%	6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ZECP and TDVG is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2021	0.94

The correlation between ZECP and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZECP vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZECP	TDVG
Technology	26.6%	27.4%
Financial Services	15.9%	19.3%
Healthcare	14.6%	12.8%
Industrials	14.4%	14.4%
Communication Services	9.4%	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.0%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	6.7%
Utilities	3.9%	3.2%
Energy	0.8%	4.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.5%
Basic Materials	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

ZECP vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZECP

ZECP Risk / Return Rank: 71
ZECP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ZECP Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ZECP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ZECP Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ZECP Martin Ratio Rank: 76

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 80
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZECP vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZECP	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.87	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	2.69	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	2.51	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.58	10.48	-0.90

ZECP vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZECP Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZECP and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZECP vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZECP	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-19.20%	-2.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.32%	-7.24%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.47%	-14.02%	-1.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.92%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.35%	-3.67%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	1.73%	+0.12%

Volatility

ZECP vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.20%. This indicates that ZECP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZECP	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	2.20%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.49%	7.30%	+1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.85%	9.74%	+1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.53%	13.87%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.53%	13.81%	+0.72%

ZECP vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZECP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZECP vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than TDVG's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.96%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	0.73%	0.79%	0.63%	0.73%	0.91%	0.11%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZECP and TDVG in my portfolio?

ZECP and TDVG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZECP or TDVG?

ZECP has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to TDVG (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZECP dropped -21.86% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, ZECP or TDVG?

On 3-year performance, ZECP leads with 14.80% vs 14.55% for TDVG. On fees, TDVG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZECP or TDVG?

Over the 3-year period, ZECP has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 14.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZECP or TDVG?

TDVG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ZECP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZECP or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.73% for ZECP.

What is the main difference between ZECP and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Zacks and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZECP and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.