PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZECP vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZECP vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZECP vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZECP
Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF
-2.68%15.03%17.32%13.88%-13.41%7.75%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
-6.48%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%35.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -6.48% return.


ZECP

1D
2.39%
1M
-5.84%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
1.41%
1Y
13.31%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
5.59%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
-6.48%
6M
-6.52%
1Y
60.95%
3Y*
84.54%
5Y*
66.14%
10Y*
69.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZECP vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZECP
ZECP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ZECP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZECP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZECP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ZECP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZECP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZECP vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZECPNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

1.48

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

2.17

-0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.92

-1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.31

7.39

-1.08

ZECP vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZECP Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZECP and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZECPNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

1.48

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.61

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between ZECP and NVDA is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZECP vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZECP
Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF
0.81%0.79%0.63%0.73%0.91%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

ZECP vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and NVDA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZECPNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.86%

-89.72%

+67.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-20.21%

+9.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-15.76%

+9.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-36.40%

+30.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

7.99%

-5.71%

Volatility

ZECP vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) is 4.47%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that ZECP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZECPNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

10.46%

-5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.83%

25.91%

-18.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

41.44%

-26.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

51.74%

-36.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

49.85%

-35.10%