ZECP vs. SPTM
ZECP (Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ZECP is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZECP returned 15.85%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZECP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
ZECP vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return.
ZECP
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
ZECP vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF | 6.36% | 15.03% | 17.32% | 13.88% | -13.41% | 7.75% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.10% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZECP and SPTM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ZECP and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZECP vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZECP
SPTM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
ZECP
SPTM
Financial Services
ZECP
SPTM
Industrials
ZECP
SPTM
Healthcare
ZECP
SPTM
Communication Services
ZECP
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
ZECP
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
ZECP
SPTM
Utilities
ZECP
SPTM
Energy
ZECP
SPTM
Real Estate
ZECP
SPTM
Basic Materials
ZECP
-
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZECP vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
ZECP
SPTM
ZECP vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZECP | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 3.22 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.46 | 15.01 | -3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZECP | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.36 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.46 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
ZECP vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZECP | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.86% | -54.80% | +32.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -8.68% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.47% | -18.87% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.67% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -9.05% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.86% | -0.05% |
Volatility
ZECP vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) is 2.14%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that ZECP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZECP | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 2.88% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.08% | 8.92% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 11.88% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 16.87% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 18.03% | -3.38% |
ZECP vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZECP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZECP vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than SPTM's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 0.63% | 0.73% | 0.91% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZECP and SPTM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPTM has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to ZECP (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZECP dropped -21.86% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 3-year performance, SPTM leads with 21.90% vs 15.85% for ZECP. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ZECP has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 15.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ZECP.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.74% for ZECP.
They also come from different issuers: Zacks and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZECP and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZECP and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer