ZECP vs. GXLC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ZECP (Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF) and GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ZECP is actively managed, while GXLC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZECP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GXLC.

Performance

ZECP vs. GXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than GXLC's 8.31% return.

ZECP

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 6.65%
• 6M: 5.71%
• 1Y: 19.89%
• 3Y*: 15.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GXLC

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 6M: 7.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZECP vs. GXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	6.65%	4.40%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	8.31%	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ZECP and GXLC is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

ZECP vs. GXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZECP

ZECP Risk / Return Rank: 60
ZECP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ZECP Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ZECP Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ZECP Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
ZECP Martin Ratio Rank: 65

GXLC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZECP vs. GXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZECP	GXLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.91	—	—

Drawdowns

ZECP vs. GXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, which is greater than GXLC's maximum drawdown of -9.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and GXLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZECP	GXLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.86%	-9.08%	-12.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-3.05%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-1.54%	-3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZECP	GXLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.79%	13.85%	-3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.63%	13.85%	+0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.63%	13.85%	+0.78%

ZECP vs. GXLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZECP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZECP vs. GXLC - Dividend Comparison

ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than GXLC's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.65%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZECP Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF	0.74%	0.79%	0.63%	0.73%	0.91%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZECP and GXLC in my portfolio?

ZECP and GXLC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZECP or GXLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZECP or GXLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ZECP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZECP or GXLC?

ZECP has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between ZECP and GXLC?

They also come from different issuers: Zacks and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZECP and 0.02% for GXLC.