ZCSH vs. XRPC
ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) and XRPC (Canary XRP ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ZCSH is passively managed, while XRPC is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZCSH charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XRPC.
Performance
ZCSH vs. XRPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCSH achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly higher than XRPC's -40.21% return.
ZCSH
- 1D
- -3.72%
- 1M
- 21.32%
- 6M
- 34.21%
- YTD
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 872.41%
- 3Y*
- 147.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPC
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- 6M
- -46.97%
- YTD
- -40.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH vs. XRPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 22.17% | -20.38% |
XRPC Canary XRP ETF | -40.21% | -26.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCSH and XRPC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCSH vs. XRPC — Risk / Return Rank
ZCSH
XRPC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZCSH vs. XRPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Canary XRP ETF (XRPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZCSH | XRPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.13 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZCSH vs. XRPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, which is greater than XRPC's maximum drawdown of -58.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and XRPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCSH | XRPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.73% | -58.81% | -34.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.13% | -56.33% | +29.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.53% | -38.18% | -35.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.03% | — | — |
Volatility
ZCSH vs. XRPC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCSH | XRPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 107.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 174.80% | 74.47% | +100.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 137.97% | 74.47% | +63.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 137.97% | 74.47% | +63.50% |
ZCSH vs. XRPC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPC's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZCSH vs. XRPC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZCSH nor XRPC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCSH and XRPC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
ZCSH and XRPC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Canary Capital. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.50% for XRPC.
Find the right allocation for ZCSH and XRPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer