XRPC vs. ESK
XRPC (Canary XRP ETF) and ESK (REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XRPC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ESK.
Performance
XRPC vs. ESK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XRPC
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- 6M
- -39.12%
- YTD
- -42.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ESK
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
XRPC Canary XRP ETF | $1.31M | $1.52M | $2.38M |
XRPC vs. ESK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPC Canary XRP ETF | -42.16% | -26.96% |
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | -44.38% | -12.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPC and ESK is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPC vs. ESK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) and REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPC vs. ESK - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPC | ESK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.75% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.30% | — | — |
Volatility
XRPC vs. ESK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPC | ESK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.66% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.66% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.66% | — | — |
XRPC vs. ESK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ESK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPC vs. ESK - Dividend Comparison
XRPC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | 1.06% | 0.30% |
XRPC Canary XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPC and ESK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ESK.
ESK has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for XRPC.
They also come from different issuers: Canary and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XRPC and 0.75% for ESK.
Find the right allocation for XRPC and ESK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer