PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRPC vs. HBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRPC vs. HBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) and Canary HBAR ETF (HBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPC achieves a -34.29% return, which is significantly lower than HBR's -20.38% return.


XRPC

1D
-1.39%
1M
-14.06%
YTD
-34.29%
6M
-45.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBR

1D
-2.47%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
-20.38%
6M
-41.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPC vs. HBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XRPC
Canary XRP ETF
-34.29%-20.79%
HBR
Canary HBAR ETF
-20.38%-34.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPC and HBR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRPC vs. HBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary XRP ETF (XRPC) and Canary HBAR ETF (HBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRPC vs. HBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRPCHBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.92

-1.03

+0.10

Drawdowns

XRPC vs. HBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPC drawdown since its inception was -48.85%, smaller than the maximum HBR drawdown of -61.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPC and HBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRPCHBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.85%

-61.62%

+12.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.24%

-57.53%

+9.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.50%

-45.06%

+15.56%

Volatility

XRPC vs. HBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRPCHBRDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.88%

74.13%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.88%

74.13%

+1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.88%

74.13%

+1.75%

XRPC vs. HBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XRPC and HBR have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

XRPC vs. HBR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRPC nor HBR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XRPC and HBR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRPC and HBR have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

XRPC and HBR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRPC and HBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer