PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCSH vs. GXRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCSH vs. GXRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZCSH achieves a 41.32% return, which is significantly higher than GXRP's -34.34% return.


ZCSH

1D
-5.29%
1M
47.90%
YTD
41.32%
6M
72.54%
1Y
1,002.48%
3Y*
185.96%
5Y*
10Y*

GXRP

1D
-1.56%
1M
-14.02%
YTD
-34.34%
6M
-45.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCSH vs. GXRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
41.32%-2.47%
GXRP
Grayscale XRP Trust ETF
-34.34%-18.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCSH and GXRP is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCSH vs. GXRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GXRP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCSH vs. GXRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZCSHGXRPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.49

ZCSH vs. GXRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCSHGXRPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

-0.98

+1.08

Drawdowns

ZCSH vs. GXRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, which is greater than GXRP's maximum drawdown of -48.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and GXRP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCSHGXRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.73%

-48.62%

-45.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.71%

-48.13%

+32.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.41%

-30.15%

-44.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.49%

Volatility

ZCSH vs. GXRP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCSHGXRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

166.02%

71.89%

+94.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.87%

71.89%

+64.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

136.87%

71.89%

+64.98%

ZCSH vs. GXRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GXRP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCSH vs. GXRP - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZCSH nor GXRP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCSH and GXRP have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXRP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXRP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

ZCSH and GXRP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC), while GXRP tracks CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.35% for GXRP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCSH and GXRP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer