GXRP vs. ETCG
GXRP (Grayscale XRP Trust ETF) and ETCG (Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale - GXRP tracks the CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index while ETCG tracks the Ethereum Classic (ETC). Both are passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXRP charges 0.35%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ETCG.
Performance
GXRP vs. ETCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GXRP having a -39.75% return and ETCG slightly higher at -39.56%.
GXRP
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -17.53%
- YTD
- -39.75%
- 6M
- -41.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETCG
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- -39.56%
- 6M
- -43.02%
- 1Y
- -52.25%
- 3Y*
- -16.15%
- 5Y*
- -32.95%
- 10Y*
- —
GXRP vs. ETCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXRP Grayscale XRP Trust ETF | -39.75% | -11.43% |
ETCG Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) | -39.56% | -13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXRP and ETCG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXRP vs. ETCG — Risk / Return Rank
GXRP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETCG
GXRP vs. ETCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP) and Grayscale Ethereum Classic Trust (ETC) (ETCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXRP | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.86 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXRP vs. ETCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXRP drawdown since its inception was -52.65%, smaller than the maximum ETCG drawdown of -96.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXRP and ETCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXRP | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.65% | -96.59% | +43.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -79.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.40% | -95.63% | +43.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.74% | -82.71% | +50.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 46.02% | — |
Volatility
GXRP vs. ETCG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXRP | ETCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.58% | 62.07% | +11.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.58% | 93.49% | -19.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.58% | 115.00% | -41.42% |
GXRP vs. ETCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXRP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ETCG's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXRP vs. ETCG - Dividend Comparison
Neither GXRP nor ETCG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GXRP and ETCG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXRP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXRP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETCG.
GXRP and ETCG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
GXRP tracks CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index, while ETCG tracks Ethereum Classic (ETC). Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GXRP and 2.50% for ETCG.
Find the right allocation for GXRP and ETCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer