GXRP vs. MNRS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GXRP (Grayscale XRP Trust ETF) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXRP is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index, while MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GXRP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MNRS.

Performance

GXRP vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXRP achieves a -41.01% return, which is significantly lower than MNRS's 21.32% return.

GXRP

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -0.33%
• 6M: -33.06%
• YTD: -41.01%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

MNRS

• 1D: 5.27%
• 1M: -1.21%
• 6M: 7.54%
• YTD: 21.32%
• 1Y: 46.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GXRP Grayscale XRP Trust ETF	$413.51K	$562.87K	$806.49K
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	$315.19K	$243.21K	$549.73K

GXRP vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXRP Grayscale XRP Trust ETF	-41.01%	-11.43%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	21.32%	-1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GXRP and MNRS is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.57

Return for Risk

GXRP vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GXRP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MNRS

MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 28
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GXRP vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale XRP Trust ETF (GXRP) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GXRP	MNRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.62	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.33	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.15	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.83	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.51	—

Drawdowns

GXRP vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXRP drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, roughly equal to the maximum MNRS drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXRP and MNRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXRP	MNRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.43%	-56.70%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.40%	-33.13%	-20.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-23.94%	-11.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXRP	MNRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	29.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	56.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.25%	75.84%	-6.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.25%	72.76%	-3.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.25%	72.76%	-3.51%

GXRP vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXRP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXRP vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison

GXRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.

Position	TTM	2025
GXRP Grayscale XRP Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.45%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXRP and MNRS in my portfolio?

GXRP and MNRS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXRP or MNRS?

On fees, GXRP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXRP or MNRS?

GXRP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MNRS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXRP or MNRS?

MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for GXRP.

What is the main difference between GXRP and MNRS?

GXRP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MNRS is Blockchain. GXRP tracks CoinDesk XRP Reference Rate Index, while MNRS tracks Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GXRP and 0.59% for MNRS.