ZCSH vs. GFOF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) and GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZCSH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Zcash (ZEC), while GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZCSH charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GFOF.

Performance

ZCSH vs. GFOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ZCSH

• 1D: -6.64%
• 1M: -41.90%
• YTD: -12.85%
• 6M: -2.07%
• 1Y: 725.30%
• 3Y*: 137.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GFOF

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCSH vs. GFOF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)	-12.85%	446.78%	96.92%	65.91%	-70.67%
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	60.08%	145.49%	-69.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCSH and GFOF is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022	0.28

Return for Risk

ZCSH vs. GFOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCSH

ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 91
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

GFOF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCSH vs. GFOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZCSH	GFOF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.20	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.90	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ZCSH	GFOF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-71.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.02%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.01%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZCSH	GFOF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	64.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	107.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	174.37%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	138.34%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	138.34%	—	—

ZCSH vs. GFOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GFOF's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZCSH vs. GFOF - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZCSH nor GFOF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.55%	4.08%
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZCSH and GFOF in my portfolio?

ZCSH and GFOF have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZCSH or GFOF?

On fees, GFOF is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZCSH or GFOF?

GFOF is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZCSH or GFOF?

ZCSH and GFOF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ZCSH and GFOF?

ZCSH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GFOF is Blockchain. ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC), while GFOF tracks Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.70% for GFOF.