PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCBA vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCBA vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF (ZCBA) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZCBA

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.18%
1Y
7.42%
3Y*
5.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBA vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZCBA and BUCK is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCBA vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCBA

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCBA vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF (ZCBA) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCBA vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCBABUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.58

1.47

-2.05

Drawdowns

ZCBA vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBA drawdown since its inception was -2.39%, smaller than the maximum BUCK drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBA and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCBABUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-5.43%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-0.04%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-0.49%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

Volatility

ZCBA vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCBABUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

3.10%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.23%

3.48%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.23%

3.48%

-0.25%

ZCBA vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCBA vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

ZCBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than BUCK's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.41%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
ZCBA
Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF
1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCBA and BUCK have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCBA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCBA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 1.51% for ZCBA.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBA and 0.35% for BUCK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCBA and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer