ZCBA vs. BUCK
ZCBA (Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds. ZCBA is passively managed, while BUCK is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. ZCBA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
ZCBA vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZCBA
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCBA vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZCBA Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF | -0.76% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCBA and BUCK is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCBA vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
ZCBA
BUCK
ZCBA vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF (ZCBA) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCBA | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 1.47 | -2.05 |
Drawdowns
ZCBA vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCBA drawdown since its inception was -2.39%, smaller than the maximum BUCK drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBA and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCBA | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -5.43% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -0.04% | -2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.00% | -0.49% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
ZCBA vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCBA | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.23% | 3.10% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.23% | 3.48% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.23% | 3.48% | -0.25% |
ZCBA vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCBA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZCBA vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
ZCBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than BUCK's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.41% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
ZCBA Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCBA and BUCK have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZCBA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCBA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.
BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 1.51% for ZCBA.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBA and 0.35% for BUCK.
Find the right allocation for ZCBA and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer