ZCBA vs. SIL

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

ZCBA (Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZCBA is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2030 Maturity Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZCBA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.

Performance

ZCBA vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF (ZCBA) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ZCBA

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIL

• 1D: -10.44%
• 1M: -16.27%
• YTD: -5.08%
• 6M: 5.34%
• 1Y: 64.31%
• 3Y*: 44.00%
• 5Y*: 11.74%
• 10Y*: 9.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBA vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ZCBA Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF	-0.76%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	-9.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCBA and SIL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026	0.38

Return for Risk

ZCBA vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 36
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCBA vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF (ZCBA) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZCBA	SIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.58	0.12	-0.70

Drawdowns

ZCBA vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBA drawdown since its inception was -2.39%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBA and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZCBA	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.39%	-82.99%	+80.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-32.91%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.24%	-32.83%	+30.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.00%	-51.44%	+50.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	13.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZCBA	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	43.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.23%	51.15%	-47.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.23%	39.48%	-36.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.23%	39.74%	-36.51%

ZCBA vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZCBA vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

ZCBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than SIL's 1.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.25%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%
ZCBA Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2030 ETF	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZCBA and SIL in my portfolio?

ZCBA and SIL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZCBA or SIL?

On fees, ZCBA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZCBA or SIL?

ZCBA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZCBA or SIL?

ZCBA has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.25% for SIL.

What is the main difference between ZCBA and SIL?

ZCBA is categorized as Government Bonds, while SIL is Silver. ZCBA tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2030 Maturity Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBA and 0.65% for SIL.