PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^DVG vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^DVG vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^DVG vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^DVG
NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index
-3.33%12.45%16.48%11.94%-11.28%21.39%13.47%27.27%-3.92%19.81%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
-4.87%20.17%24.88%53.81%-32.97%26.63%47.58%37.96%-1.04%31.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^DVG achieves a -3.33% return, which is significantly higher than ^NDX's -4.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ^DVG has underperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 10.19%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.


^DVG

1D
2.18%
1M
-5.43%
YTD
-3.33%
6M
-2.58%
1Y
10.48%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
10.19%

^NDX

1D
1.18%
1M
-3.89%
YTD
-4.87%
6M
-3.15%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^DVG vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^DVG
^DVG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
^DVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DVG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
^DVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DVG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
^NDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
^NDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^DVG vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^DVG^NDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

1.04

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

1.62

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.93

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.63

7.05

-2.42

^DVG vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^DVG Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^DVG and ^NDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^DVG^NDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.04

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.56

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.81

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.55

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between ^DVG and ^NDX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^DVG vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^DVG drawdown since its inception was -48.54%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -82.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^DVG and ^NDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^DVG^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.54%

-82.90%

+34.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-12.72%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.58%

-35.56%

+13.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.85%

-35.56%

+3.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.58%

-8.04%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.90%

-24.72%

+17.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

3.49%

-0.97%

Volatility

^DVG vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers Select Index (^DVG) is 4.26%, while NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that ^DVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^DVG^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

6.65%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.21%

12.93%

-4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

22.77%

-6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

22.61%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

22.48%

-6.23%