PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZALT vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZALT vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZALT vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
-0.34%9.44%11.92%3.95%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
0.94%23.23%-3.96%12.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZALT achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 0.94% return.


ZALT

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
1.82%
1Y
9.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISWN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
0.94%
6M
3.42%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZALT vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZALT vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZALT
ZALT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ZALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZALT Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ZALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZALT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZALT vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZALTISWNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

1.35

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

1.86

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.61

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.40

6.68

+2.72

ZALT vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZALT and ISWN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZALTISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.35

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.54

-0.04

+1.58

Correlation

The correlation between ZALT and ISWN is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZALT vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

ZALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


TTM20252024202320222021
ZALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.91%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%

Drawdowns

ZALT vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZALT drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZALT and ISWN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZALTISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-32.35%

+24.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.43%

-9.63%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-7.11%

+5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.50%

-16.57%

+16.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

2.32%

-1.35%

Volatility

ZALT vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is 1.32%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that ZALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZALTISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

6.13%

-4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.57%

8.60%

-5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.55%

11.81%

-3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

11.47%

-4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.55%

11.40%

-4.85%