PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ISWN vs. CNM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ISWN and CNM is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

ISWN vs. CNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Core & Main, Inc. (CNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-4.03%
7.99%
ISWN
CNM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ISWN:

0.38

CNM:

0.60

Sortino Ratio

ISWN:

0.61

CNM:

1.05

Omega Ratio

ISWN:

1.07

CNM:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

ISWN:

0.17

CNM:

0.65

Martin Ratio

ISWN:

0.77

CNM:

1.33

Ulcer Index

ISWN:

6.01%

CNM:

18.85%

Daily Std Dev

ISWN:

12.21%

CNM:

41.81%

Max Drawdown

ISWN:

-32.35%

CNM:

-40.00%

Current Drawdown

ISWN:

-21.05%

CNM:

-11.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWN achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly lower than CNM's 7.23% return.


ISWN

YTD

5.72%

1M

4.89%

6M

-4.03%

1Y

3.91%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CNM

YTD

7.23%

1M

-1.14%

6M

7.99%

1Y

22.48%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ISWN vs. CNM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ISWN is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ISWN is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ISWN is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ISWN is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ISWN is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ISWN is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

CNM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNM is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNM is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNM is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNM is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNM is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNM is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ISWN vs. CNM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Core & Main, Inc. (CNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ISWN, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.380.60
The chart of Sortino ratio for ISWN, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.611.05
The chart of Omega ratio for ISWN, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.071.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for ISWN, currently valued at 0.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.170.65
The chart of Martin ratio for ISWN, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.000.771.33
ISWN
CNM

The current ISWN Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the CNM Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWN and CNM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.38
0.60
ISWN
CNM

Dividends

ISWN vs. CNM - Dividend Comparison

ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, while CNM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
3.09%3.27%2.90%2.00%0.76%
CNM
Core & Main, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ISWN vs. CNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, smaller than the maximum CNM drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and CNM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-21.05%
-11.99%
ISWN
CNM

Volatility

ISWN vs. CNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) is 3.01%, while Core & Main, Inc. (CNM) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that ISWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.01%
5.34%
ISWN
CNM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab