ZALT vs. EALT

In the year-to-date period, ZALT achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than EALT's -3.83% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Both ZALT and EALT have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ZALT Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the EALT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZALT and EALT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ZALT nor EALT has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ZALT drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum EALT drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZALT and EALT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is 3.66%, while Innovator U.S. Equity 5 To 15 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EALT) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that ZALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.