PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZALT vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZALT vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZALT achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.


ZALT

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.94%
YTD
3.61%
6M
3.99%
1Y
10.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZALT vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
3.61%9.44%11.92%3.95%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%11.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ZALT and SPY is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023

0.82

The correlation between ZALT and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZALT vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZALT
SPY

Technology

36.2%
35.9%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.8%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.6%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

ZALT
36.2%
SPY
35.9%

Financial Services

ZALT
11.9%
SPY
11.8%

Communication Services

ZALT
10.9%
SPY
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ZALT
10.1%
SPY
10.3%

Healthcare

ZALT
8.4%
SPY
8.4%

Industrials

ZALT
8.1%
SPY
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

ZALT
4.9%
SPY
4.8%

Energy

ZALT
3.5%
SPY
3.6%

Utilities

ZALT
2.3%
SPY
2.4%

Real Estate

ZALT
1.9%
SPY
1.9%

Basic Materials

ZALT
1.8%
SPY
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZALT vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZALT
ZALT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ZALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZALT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ZALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZALT vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZALTSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.43

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.08

3.16

+2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.69

14.72

+6.98

ZALT vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZALT Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZALT and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZALTSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.38

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.73

0.59

+1.14

Drawdowns

ZALT vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZALT drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZALT and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZALTSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-55.19%

+47.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.71%

-8.88%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.70%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-9.05%

+8.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

1.91%

-1.43%

Volatility

ZALT vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is 0.39%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that ZALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZALTSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

2.84%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

8.90%

-5.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

11.83%

-7.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

17.05%

-10.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.38%

17.94%

-11.56%

ZALT vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZALT vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

ZALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%
ZALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZALT and SPY have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to ZALT (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZALT dropped -8.19% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 1-year performance, SPY leads with 27.98% vs 10.35% for ZALT. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ZALT has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPY has performed better with a 27.98% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ZALT.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for ZALT.

ZALT is categorized as Options Trading, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ZALT and 0.09% for SPY.

ZALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZALT and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer