ZALT vs. PAGRX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ZALT (Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and PAGRX (Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I) are both funds - ZALT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while PAGRX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Permanent Portfolio. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZALT returned 9.80% vs 24.64% for PAGRX. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ZALT charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for PAGRX.

Performance

ZALT vs. PAGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I (PAGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZALT achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly lower than PAGRX's 6.91% return.

ZALT

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: 3.81%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 1Y: 9.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.60%

PAGRX

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -3.14%
• 6M: 3.47%
• YTD: 6.91%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 31.22%
• 5Y*: 17.53%
• 10Y*: 19.45%
• ALL TIME*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
ZALT Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	$4.27M	$7.49M	$4.59M

ZALT vs. PAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ZALT Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	4.61%	9.44%	11.92%	3.79%
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I	6.91%	36.92%	44.52%	14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ZALT and PAGRX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.68

The correlation between ZALT and PAGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZALT vs. PAGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZALT

ZALT Risk / Return Rank: 92
ZALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ZALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ZALT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ZALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ZALT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

PAGRX

PAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 49
PAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZALT vs. PAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I (PAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZALT	PAGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.19	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	1.69	+1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.21	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.32	2.34	+2.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.65	6.90	+11.76

ZALT vs. PAGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZALT Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the PAGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZALT and PAGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZALT vs. PAGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZALT drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum PAGRX drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZALT and PAGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZALT	PAGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.19%	-55.87%	+47.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.71%	-9.16%	+7.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-36.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.09%	+8.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.46%	-10.03%	+9.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.49%	3.11%	-2.62%

Volatility

ZALT vs. PAGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) is 1.34%, while Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I (PAGRX) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that ZALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZALT	PAGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.34%	4.20%	-2.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.66%	13.89%	-11.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.23%	18.12%	-13.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.24%	24.54%	-18.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.24%	24.48%	-18.24%

ZALT vs. PAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGRX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZALT vs. PAGRX - Dividend Comparison

ZALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I	0.03%	0.03%	5.62%	2.72%	7.79%	6.82%	15.08%	17.51%	12.33%	8.70%	16.94%	6.31%
ZALT Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZALT and PAGRX in my portfolio?

ZALT and PAGRX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZALT or PAGRX?

PAGRX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to ZALT (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZALT dropped -8.19% vs PAGRX's -55.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.