ZALT vs. CLIP

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

ZALT (Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZALT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. ZALT is actively managed, while CLIP is passively managed. Over the past year, ZALT returned 9.90% vs 3.88% for CLIP. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. ZALT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.

Performance

ZALT vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZALT achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than CLIP's 1.89% return.

ZALT

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: 3.97%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 1Y: 9.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLIP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.79%
• YTD: 1.89%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZALT vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ZALT Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	4.61%	9.44%	11.92%	3.79%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.89%	4.23%	5.26%	1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ZALT and CLIP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	-0.00

Return for Risk

ZALT vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZALT

ZALT Risk / Return Rank: 92
ZALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ZALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ZALT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
ZALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ZALT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZALT vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZALT	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	17.92	-15.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	95.59	-92.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	29.48	-27.96
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.76	196.85	-191.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.60	1,501.36	-1,480.76

ZALT vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZALT Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZALT and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZALT vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZALT drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZALT and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZALT	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.19%	-0.08%	-8.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.71%	-0.02%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.46%	-0.00%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.00%	+0.48%

Volatility

ZALT vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (ZALT) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.08%. This indicates that ZALT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZALT	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.56%	0.08%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.63%	0.16%	+2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.08%	0.22%	+3.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.27%	0.44%	+5.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.27%	0.44%	+5.83%

ZALT vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZALT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZALT vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

ZALT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.86%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%
ZALT Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZALT and CLIP in my portfolio?

ZALT and CLIP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZALT or CLIP?

ZALT has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to CLIP (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZALT dropped -8.19% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, ZALT or CLIP?

On 1-year performance, ZALT leads with 9.90% vs 3.88% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZALT or CLIP?

Over the 1-year period, ZALT has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 3.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZALT or CLIP?

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ZALT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZALT or CLIP?

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.00% for ZALT.

What is the main difference between ZALT and CLIP?

ZALT is categorized as Options Trading, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ZALT and 0.07% for CLIP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.92 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.