PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLIP vs. BILS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLIP vs. BILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) and State Street SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLIP achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than BILS's 2.00% return.


CLIP

1D
0.03%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.83%
YTD
2.13%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.66%

BILS

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.72%
YTD
2.00%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.26M$30.42M$33.30M
$16.58M$21.00M$33.74M

CLIP vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
2.13%4.23%5.26%2.82%
BILS
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
2.00%4.23%5.17%2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CLIP and BILS is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023

0.31

Over the past year, CLIP and BILS have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLIP vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BILS
BILS Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILS Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILS Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLIP vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) and State Street SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLIPBILSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+21.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

35.98

30.56

+5.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

197.11

128.82

+68.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,667.91

1,210.03

+457.88

CLIP vs. BILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLIP Sharpe Ratio is 18.23, which is comparable to the BILS Sharpe Ratio of 16.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLIP and BILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLIP vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIP drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum BILS drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIP and BILS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLIPBILSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-0.41%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.03%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.08%

-0.04%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Volatility

CLIP vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison

Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) and State Street SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS) have volatilities of 0.07% and 0.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLIPBILSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

0.07%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

0.14%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

0.24%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.43%

0.31%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.43%

0.29%

+0.14%

CLIP vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIP has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CLIP vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison

CLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than BILS's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BILS
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF
3.41%4.08%5.01%4.98%1.61%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.49%4.14%5.11%2.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLIP and BILS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BILS has higher volatility (0.07%) compared to CLIP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLIP dropped -0.08% vs BILS's -0.41%.

On 3-year performance, CLIP leads with 4.63% vs 4.58% for BILS. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CLIP has performed better with a 4.63% return vs 4.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BILS.

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 3.41% for BILS.

CLIP tracks Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD, while BILS tracks Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for CLIP and 0.14% for BILS.

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.23 vs 16.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLIP and BILS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer