YYY vs. EAOA
YYY (Amplify CEF High Income ETF) and EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - YYY tracks the Nasdaq CEF High Income™ Index while EAOA tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, YYY returned 3.03%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for EAOA. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YYY charges 3.23%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOA.
Performance
YYY vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YYY achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than EAOA's 10.26% return.
YYY
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- 12.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
EAOA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
YYY vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF | 4.37% | 13.08% | 11.86% | 12.98% | -21.78% | 14.13% | 15.55% |
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 10.26% | 18.41% | 13.79% | 18.27% | -17.76% | 14.52% | 19.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between YYY and EAOA is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between YYY and EAOA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
YYY vs. EAOA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YYY
EAOA
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
YYY
EAOA
Healthcare
YYY
EAOA
Energy
YYY
EAOA
Real Estate
YYY
EAOA
Technology
YYY
EAOA
Utilities
YYY
EAOA
Industrials
YYY
EAOA
Communication Services
YYY
EAOA
Consumer Cyclical
YYY
EAOA
Consumer Defensive
YYY
EAOA
Basic Materials
YYY
EAOA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YYY vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank
YYY
EAOA
YYY vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YYY | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.99 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 13.28 | -6.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YYY | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 2.28 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.65 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.93 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
YYY vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YYY drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, which is greater than EAOA's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YYY and EAOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YYY | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -25.06% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -8.17% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.47% | -13.84% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.92% | -25.06% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -0.41% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -5.31% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 1.84% | -0.02% |
Volatility
YYY vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) is 2.50%, while iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that YYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YYY | EAOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 3.33% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.09% | 8.65% | -1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.56% | 10.75% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 13.24% | -1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 13.14% | +0.76% |
YYY vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
YYY has a 3.23% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
YYY vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison
YYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.63%, more than EAOA's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF | 1.95% | 2.10% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YYY Amplify CEF High Income ETF | 12.63% | 12.51% | 12.50% | 12.39% | 12.36% | 9.08% | 9.79% | 9.10% | 9.73% | 8.16% | 10.34% | 10.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YYY and EAOA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAOA has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to YYY (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YYY dropped -42.52% vs EAOA's -25.06%.
On 5-year performance, EAOA leads with 8.58% vs 3.03% for YYY. On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, YYY has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 8.58% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 3.23% for YYY.
YYY has the higher dividend yield at 12.63%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.
YYY tracks Nasdaq CEF High Income™ Index, while EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 3.23% for YYY and 0.18% for EAOA.
EAOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YYY and EAOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer