PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YYY vs. CGBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YYY vs. CGBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YYY vs. CGBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
YYY
Amplify CEF High Income ETF
-0.92%13.08%11.86%8.32%
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
-1.67%15.33%16.64%9.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YYY achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly higher than CGBL's -1.67% return.


YYY

1D
0.18%
1M
-4.58%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
-0.83%
1Y
9.89%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
5.60%

CGBL

1D
0.58%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
0.29%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YYY vs. CGBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

YYY has a 3.23% expense ratio, which is higher than CGBL's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YYY vs. CGBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YYY
YYY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
YYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
YYY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
YYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
YYY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CGBL
CGBL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CGBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CGBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGBL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YYY vs. CGBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YYYCGBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.76

1.10

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

1.64

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

1.73

-0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.18

7.00

-2.82

YYY vs. CGBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YYY Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the CGBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YYY and CGBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YYYCGBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

1.10

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.47

-1.06

Correlation

The correlation between YYY and CGBL is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

YYY vs. CGBL - Dividend Comparison

YYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.03%, more than CGBL's 2.03% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
YYY
Amplify CEF High Income ETF
13.03%12.51%12.50%12.39%12.36%9.08%9.79%9.10%9.73%8.16%10.34%10.77%
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
2.03%1.98%1.92%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

YYY vs. CGBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YYY drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, which is greater than CGBL's maximum drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YYY and CGBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YYYCGBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.52%

-11.66%

-30.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.70%

-8.11%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

-5.26%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-1.31%

-5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.00%

+0.32%

Volatility

YYY vs. CGBL - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) at 4.54%. This indicates that YYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YYYCGBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

4.54%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

7.40%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

12.41%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.33%

11.01%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.89%

11.01%

+2.88%