YXI vs. KBA
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA).
YXI and KBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. YXI is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). It was launched on Mar 16, 2010. KBA is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2014. Both YXI and KBA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
YXI vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
YXI vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 6.45% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 12.40% | 4.78% | 13.94% | -17.95% | -14.35% | 9.63% | -28.43% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | -2.07% | 33.88% | 15.73% | -16.77% | -3.49% | 3.17% | 41.62% | 35.44% | -26.28% | 30.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YXI achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly higher than KBA's -2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, YXI has underperformed KBA with an annualized return of -8.57%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.14% annualized return.
YXI
- 1D
- -3.53%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- 1Y
- -2.92%
- 3Y*
- -10.01%
- 5Y*
- -2.92%
- 10Y*
- -8.57%
KBA
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
YXI vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
YXI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
YXI vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank
YXI
KBA
YXI vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YXI | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | 1.63 | -1.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | 2.20 | -2.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 2.54 | -2.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 10.01 | -10.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YXI | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 1.63 | -1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.19 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.31 | 0.32 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.31 | 0.31 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between YXI and KBA is -0.68. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
YXI vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than KBA's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.89% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.60% | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 49.05% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.46% | 6.62% | 29.08% |
Drawdowns
YXI vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YXI drawdown since its inception was -81.15%, which is greater than KBA's maximum drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YXI and KBA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| YXI | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.15% | -53.24% | -27.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.83% | -11.30% | -18.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.65% | -40.42% | -17.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -45.32% | -21.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.26% | -5.08% | -73.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.04% | -26.15% | -27.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.94% | 3.01% | +19.93% |
Volatility
YXI vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) has a higher volatility of 7.90% compared to KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) at 5.63%. This indicates that YXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| YXI | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.90% | 5.63% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.78% | 11.80% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.75% | 18.64% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.35% | 27.07% | +4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.46% | 25.28% | +2.18% |