PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YXI vs. EEMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YXI vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YXI achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 36.85% return. Over the past 10 years, YXI has underperformed EEMO with an annualized return of -8.18%, while EEMO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.50% annualized return.


YXI

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.15%
YTD
7.60%
6M
9.50%
1Y
1.04%
3Y*
-11.86%
5Y*
-2.76%
10Y*
-8.18%

EEMO

1D
-2.42%
1M
10.83%
YTD
36.85%
6M
37.37%
1Y
51.13%
3Y*
24.00%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YXI vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
7.60%-22.87%-25.36%12.40%4.78%13.94%-17.95%-14.35%9.63%-28.43%
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
36.85%10.99%9.88%13.90%-18.73%-5.57%9.66%21.17%-17.24%49.65%

Correlation

The correlation between YXI and EEMO is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

-0.54

The correlation between YXI and EEMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.68 (1 year) to -0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YXI vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YXI
YXI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
YXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
YXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
YXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMO
EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YXI vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YXIEEMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.42

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

3.48

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

13.93

-13.80

YXI vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YXI and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YXIEEMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

2.09

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.35

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.30

0.39

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.13

-0.43

Drawdowns

YXI vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YXI drawdown since its inception was -81.15%, which is greater than EEMO's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YXI and EEMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YXIEEMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.15%

-48.47%

-32.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.21%

-14.75%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.12%

-26.06%

-27.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.65%

-34.03%

-23.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.92%

-46.57%

-18.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.03%

-3.71%

-74.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.31%

-20.17%

-34.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.79%

3.68%

+4.11%

Volatility

YXI vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) is 7.25%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that YXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YXIEEMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.25%

14.18%

-6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.87%

22.26%

-7.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.93%

24.58%

-4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.39%

19.36%

+12.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.42%

21.59%

+5.83%

YXI vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YXI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

YXI vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than EEMO's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMO
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.68%2.31%2.57%3.65%3.82%1.51%1.53%2.13%13.10%5.13%1.55%2.92%
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
2.85%3.60%4.35%2.66%0.27%0.00%0.08%1.01%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YXI and EEMO have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMO has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to YXI (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YXI dropped -81.15% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

On 10-year performance, EEMO leads with 8.50% vs -8.18% for YXI. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, YXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EEMO has performed better with a 8.50% return vs -8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YXI.

YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.68% for EEMO.

YXI is categorized as Inverse Equities, while EEMO is Momentum. YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%), while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YXI and 0.31% for EEMO.

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YXI and EEMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer