PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YSEP vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YSEP vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YSEP achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 16.06% return.


YSEP

1D
0.44%
1M
1.53%
YTD
5.17%
6M
6.25%
1Y
13.73%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.12%
YTD
16.06%
6M
15.73%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YSEP vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YSEP and QDTE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2024

0.57

The correlation between YSEP and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

YSEP vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YSEP
QDTE

Financial Services

24.2%
5.4%

Industrials

18.9%

-

Healthcare

11.2%

-

Technology

9.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.8%

-

Communication Services

5.8%

-

Basic Materials

5.6%

-

Energy

3.3%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Financial Services

YSEP
24.2%
QDTE
5.4%

Industrials

YSEP
18.9%
QDTE

-

Healthcare

YSEP
11.2%
QDTE

-

Technology

YSEP
9.0%
QDTE

-

Consumer Cyclical

YSEP
8.9%
QDTE

-

Consumer Defensive

YSEP
7.8%
QDTE

-

Communication Services

YSEP
5.8%
QDTE

-

Basic Materials

YSEP
5.6%
QDTE

-

Energy

YSEP
3.3%
QDTE

-

Utilities

YSEP
3.3%
QDTE

-

Real Estate

YSEP
2.0%
QDTE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YSEP vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YSEP
YSEP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
YSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
YSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
YSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
YSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YSEP vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YSEPQDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.86

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

15.60

-5.54

YSEP vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YSEP and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YSEPQDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.66

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

1.29

-0.68

Drawdowns

YSEP vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YSEP drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, roughly equal to the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YSEP and QDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YSEPQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-22.86%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-10.20%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.60%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-3.14%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

2.52%

-1.15%

Volatility

YSEP vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) is 2.09%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that YSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YSEPQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.09%

3.72%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.19%

11.01%

-4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.10%

14.81%

-6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.41%

18.42%

-7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.41%

18.42%

-7.01%

YSEP vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

YSEP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

YSEP vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

YSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.41%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YSEP and QDTE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDTE has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to YSEP (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YSEP dropped -22.58% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 39.17% vs 13.73% for YSEP. On fees, YSEP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, YSEP has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 39.17% return vs 13.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YSEP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.41%, compared with 0.00% for YSEP.

YSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YSEP and 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YSEP and QDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer