YPF vs. EMB
YPF (YPF Sociedad Anónima) is a stock, while EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index. Over the past 10 years, YPF returned 10.11%/yr vs 2.84%/yr for EMB. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
YPF vs. EMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YPF achieves a 36.89% return, which is significantly higher than EMB's 1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, YPF has outperformed EMB with an annualized return of 10.11%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.84% annualized return.
YPF
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -11.43%
- 6M
- 46.36%
- YTD
- 36.89%
- 1Y
- 59.83%
- 3Y*
- 50.64%
- 5Y*
- 61.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
EMB
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- 8.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- 2.84%
YPF vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YPF YPF Sociedad Anónima | 36.89% | -14.94% | 147.29% | 87.05% | 140.58% | -18.72% | -59.41% | -12.86% | -41.18% | 39.31% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.67% | 13.85% | 5.54% | 10.62% | -18.63% | -2.23% | 5.42% | 15.48% | -5.47% | 10.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between YPF and EMB is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2007 | 0.24 |
The correlation between YPF and EMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YPF vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank
YPF
EMB
YPF vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YPF | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 2.09 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 8.94 | -4.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YPF vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YPF drawdown since its inception was -94.58%, which is greater than EMB's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YPF and EMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YPF | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.58% | -34.70% | -59.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.89% | -4.51% | -30.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.79% | -7.95% | -40.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.79% | -28.74% | -20.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.08% | -28.74% | -61.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.16% | -1.08% | -11.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.04% | -5.03% | -34.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.03% | 1.05% | +11.98% |
Volatility
YPF vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison
YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) has a higher volatility of 12.17% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) at 1.66%. This indicates that YPF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YPF | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.17% | 1.66% | +10.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.02% | 4.77% | +23.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.81% | 5.61% | +47.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.63% | 9.77% | +44.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.73% | 9.95% | +44.78% |
Dividends
YPF vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison
YPF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.10% | 4.98% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% |
YPF YPF Sociedad Anónima | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.19% | 0.60% | 0.32% | 0.66% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YPF and EMB have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YPF has higher volatility (12.17%) compared to EMB (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YPF dropped -94.58% vs EMB's -34.70%.
EMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YPF and EMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer