YPF vs. PAM

In the year-to-date period, YPF achieves a 144.44% return, which is significantly higher than PAM's 73.51% return. Over the past 10 years, YPF has underperformed PAM with an annualized return of 4.95%, while PAM has yielded a comparatively higher 23.93% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current YPF Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the PAM Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YPF and PAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither YPF nor PAM has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum YPF drawdown since its inception was -94.53%, which is greater than PAM's maximum drawdown of -87.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YPF and PAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) has a higher volatility of 13.90% compared to Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM) at 9.80%. This indicates that YPF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between YPF Sociedad Anónima and Pampa Energía S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.