PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YOLO vs. OMFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YOLO vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YOLO vs. OMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
-19.09%36.36%-17.81%-15.10%-72.21%-20.48%47.17%-50.02%
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
-0.49%13.68%6.82%21.53%-13.97%28.95%20.91%15.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YOLO achieves a -19.09% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's -0.49% return.


YOLO

1D
1.52%
1M
-6.64%
YTD
-19.09%
6M
-23.28%
1Y
50.85%
3Y*
-1.62%
5Y*
-34.43%
10Y*

OMFL

1D
0.93%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
1.40%
1Y
14.28%
3Y*
10.52%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YOLO vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

YOLO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YOLO vs. OMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YOLO
YOLO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
YOLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YOLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
YOLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
YOLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
YOLO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

OMFL
OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YOLO vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YOLOOMFLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

0.86

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

1.33

+0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.48

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.75

6.95

-4.20

YOLO vs. OMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YOLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the OMFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YOLO and OMFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YOLOOMFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.86

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.66

0.46

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

0.63

-1.14

Correlation

The correlation between YOLO and OMFL is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

YOLO vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%3.57%1.17%0.55%3.93%2.03%4.52%0.00%0.00%
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
0.85%0.80%1.22%1.37%1.55%0.95%1.48%1.53%1.39%0.32%

Drawdowns

YOLO vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YOLO drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOLO and OMFL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YOLOOMFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.68%

-33.24%

-61.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.09%

-10.00%

-31.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.23%

-22.44%

-70.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.54%

-4.31%

-86.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.44%

-4.89%

-63.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.46%

2.13%

+16.33%

Volatility

YOLO vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a higher volatility of 15.29% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 5.22%. This indicates that YOLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YOLOOMFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.29%

5.22%

+10.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.82%

10.06%

+40.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.85%

16.71%

+55.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.54%

16.81%

+35.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.88%

20.25%

+30.63%