PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
YOLO vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YOLO vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-28.31%
3.91%
YOLO
LIT

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with YOLO having a -11.02% return and LIT slightly higher at -10.55%.


YOLO

YTD

-11.02%

1M

-20.49%

6M

-31.96%

1Y

-7.72%

5Y (annualized)

-25.06%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

LIT

YTD

-10.55%

1M

6.84%

6M

1.68%

1Y

-7.18%

5Y (annualized)

13.64%

10Y (annualized)

7.94%

Key characteristics


YOLOLIT
Sharpe Ratio-0.13-0.25
Sortino Ratio0.18-0.15
Omega Ratio1.020.98
Calmar Ratio-0.07-0.13
Martin Ratio-0.32-0.46
Ulcer Index19.99%18.12%
Daily Std Dev51.45%32.79%
Max Drawdown-91.56%-62.61%
Current Drawdown-90.71%-51.65%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YOLO vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both YOLO and LIT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
Expense ratio chart for YOLO: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for LIT: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between YOLO and LIT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

YOLO vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for YOLO, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.13-0.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for YOLO, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.18-0.15
The chart of Omega ratio for YOLO, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.020.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for YOLO, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.07-0.13
The chart of Martin ratio for YOLO, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.32-0.46
YOLO
LIT

The current YOLO Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is higher than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YOLO and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.13
-0.25
YOLO
LIT

Dividends

YOLO vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

YOLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than LIT's 1.34% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
3.63%1.18%0.56%3.93%2.03%4.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
1.34%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%0.32%

Drawdowns

YOLO vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YOLO drawdown since its inception was -91.56%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOLO and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-90.71%
-51.65%
YOLO
LIT

Volatility

YOLO vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a higher volatility of 22.45% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 10.59%. This indicates that YOLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
22.45%
10.59%
YOLO
LIT