PortfoliosLab logo
YOLO vs. LIT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between YOLO and LIT is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

YOLO vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

YOLO:

-1.26

LIT:

-0.42

Sortino Ratio

YOLO:

-1.95

LIT:

-0.50

Omega Ratio

YOLO:

0.77

LIT:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

YOLO:

-0.56

LIT:

-0.23

Martin Ratio

YOLO:

-1.39

LIT:

-0.94

Ulcer Index

YOLO:

37.89%

LIT:

15.91%

Daily Std Dev

YOLO:

43.22%

LIT:

32.82%

Max Drawdown

YOLO:

-94.68%

LIT:

-65.91%

Current Drawdown

YOLO:

-93.16%

LIT:

-58.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YOLO achieves a -20.25% return, which is significantly lower than LIT's -5.39% return.


YOLO

YTD

-20.25%

1M

9.72%

6M

-28.78%

1Y

-52.43%

5Y*

-26.33%

10Y*

N/A

LIT

YTD

-5.39%

1M

10.04%

6M

-11.76%

1Y

-14.97%

5Y*

8.98%

10Y*

5.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YOLO vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both YOLO and LIT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

YOLO vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YOLO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of YOLO is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of YOLO is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of YOLO is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of YOLO is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of YOLO is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of YOLO is 11
Martin Ratio Rank

LIT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LIT is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LIT is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LIT is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LIT is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LIT is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LIT is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

YOLO vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current YOLO Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is lower than the LIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YOLO and LIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

YOLO vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

YOLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than LIT's 0.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
3.06%3.60%1.18%0.56%3.93%2.03%4.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
0.98%0.93%1.11%0.99%0.22%0.40%1.85%2.52%3.26%2.15%0.24%1.07%

Drawdowns

YOLO vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YOLO drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOLO and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

YOLO vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a higher volatility of 14.56% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 5.97%. This indicates that YOLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...