PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YOLO vs. CNBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YOLO vs. CNBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YOLO vs. CNBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
-19.09%36.36%-17.81%-15.10%-72.21%-20.48%47.17%-38.98%
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
-19.71%15.33%-29.41%-16.11%-63.98%-19.02%31.94%-44.97%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with YOLO having a -19.09% return and CNBS slightly lower at -19.71%.


YOLO

1D
1.52%
1M
-6.64%
YTD
-19.09%
6M
-23.28%
1Y
50.85%
3Y*
-1.62%
5Y*
-34.43%
10Y*

CNBS

1D
3.35%
1M
1.68%
YTD
-19.71%
6M
-25.83%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
-12.81%
5Y*
-37.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YOLO vs. CNBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both YOLO and CNBS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

YOLO vs. CNBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YOLO
YOLO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
YOLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YOLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
YOLO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
YOLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
YOLO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CNBS
CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YOLO vs. CNBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YOLOCNBSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

0.34

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

1.39

+0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

0.68

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.75

1.34

+1.41

YOLO vs. CNBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YOLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the CNBS Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YOLO and CNBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YOLOCNBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.34

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.66

-0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

-0.46

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between YOLO and CNBS is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

YOLO vs. CNBS - Dividend Comparison

Neither YOLO nor CNBS has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%3.57%1.17%0.55%3.93%2.03%4.52%
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%43.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%0.58%

Drawdowns

YOLO vs. CNBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YOLO drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, roughly equal to the maximum CNBS drawdown of -95.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOLO and CNBS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YOLOCNBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.68%

-95.71%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.09%

-51.25%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.23%

-94.21%

+0.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.54%

-93.00%

+2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.44%

-70.74%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.46%

25.95%

-7.49%

Volatility

YOLO vs. CNBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) is 15.29%, while Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a volatility of 22.14%. This indicates that YOLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YOLOCNBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.29%

22.14%

-6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.82%

75.61%

-24.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.85%

101.71%

-29.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.54%

62.86%

-10.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.88%

60.38%

-9.50%