YOLO vs. HDGE
YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YOLO is a Cannabis fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, YOLO returned -30.84%/yr vs -3.57%/yr for HDGE. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. YOLO charges 0.75%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.
Performance
YOLO vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YOLO achieves a -6.36% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 2.81% return.
YOLO
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -6.36%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 60.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- -30.84%
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- -4.58%
- 3Y*
- -5.86%
- 5Y*
- -3.57%
- 10Y*
- -14.98%
YOLO vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | -6.36% | 36.36% | -17.81% | -15.10% | -72.21% | -20.48% | 47.17% | -50.02% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 2.81% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -43.47% | -17.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between YOLO and HDGE is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019 | -0.48 |
The correlation between YOLO and HDGE shifts across timeframes, from -0.48 (all time) to -0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
YOLO vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YOLO
HDGE
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
YOLO
HDGE
Healthcare
YOLO
HDGE
Consumer Defensive
YOLO
HDGE
Consumer Cyclical
YOLO
HDGE
Real Estate
YOLO
HDGE
Basic Materials
YOLO
-
HDGE
Communication Services
YOLO
-
HDGE
Energy
YOLO
-
HDGE
Industrials
YOLO
-
HDGE
Technology
YOLO
-
HDGE
Utilities
YOLO
-
HDGE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YOLO vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank
YOLO
HDGE
YOLO vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YOLO | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | -0.25 | +1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | -0.24 | +2.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.97 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | -0.33 | +1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | -0.60 | +3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YOLO | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | -0.25 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.58 | -0.15 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | -0.68 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
YOLO vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YOLO drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, roughly equal to the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOLO and HDGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YOLO | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.68% | -93.88% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.09% | -12.26% | -28.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.45% | -29.46% | -36.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.47% | -42.97% | -49.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.05% | -93.25% | +4.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.93% | -70.11% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.75% | 6.77% | +14.98% |
Volatility
YOLO vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) at 6.34%. This indicates that YOLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YOLO | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.95% | 6.34% | +5.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.24% | 12.56% | +39.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.34% | 18.16% | +56.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.58% | 24.16% | +29.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.33% | 23.55% | +27.78% |
YOLO vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
YOLO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
YOLO vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison
YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.40% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.57% | 1.17% | 0.55% | 3.93% | 2.03% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YOLO and HDGE have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YOLO has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to HDGE (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YOLO dropped -94.68% vs HDGE's -93.88%.
On 5-year performance, HDGE leads with -3.57% vs -30.84% for YOLO. On fees, YOLO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDGE has performed better with a -3.57% return vs -30.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YOLO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 0.00% for YOLO.
YOLO is categorized as Cannabis, while HDGE is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YOLO and 3.36% for HDGE.
YOLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YOLO and HDGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer