YOLO vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YOLO is a Cannabis fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YOLO charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

YOLO vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

YOLO

• 1D: -5.00%
• 1M: -8.90%
• YTD: -19.39%
• 6M: -20.12%
• 1Y: 51.14%
• 3Y*: 2.29%
• 5Y*: -32.93%
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YOLO vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF	-19.39%	36.36%	-17.81%	-15.10%	-72.21%	-33.11%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between YOLO and EATZ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.41

The correlation between YOLO and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

YOLO vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YOLO	EATZ
Financial Services	43.1%	-
Healthcare	29.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	10.2%	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	0.8%	78.2%
Real Estate	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.3%
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	4.9%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

YOLO vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YOLO

YOLO Risk / Return Rank: 26
YOLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
YOLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
YOLO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
YOLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
YOLO Martin Ratio Rank: 20

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YOLO vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YOLO	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.25	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	YOLO	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-66.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.57%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.06%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	YOLO	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.34%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.07%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.79%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.30%	—	—

YOLO vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

YOLO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

YOLO vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	3.57%	1.17%	0.55%	3.93%	2.03%	4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YOLO and EATZ in my portfolio?

YOLO and EATZ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, YOLO or EATZ?

On fees, YOLO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, YOLO or EATZ?

YOLO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YOLO or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for YOLO.

What is the main difference between YOLO and EATZ?

YOLO is categorized as Cannabis, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YOLO and 1.00% for EATZ.