PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YOC.DE vs. CLMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

YOC.DE vs. CLMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in YOC AG (YOC.DE) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

YOC.DE is traded in EUR, while CLMB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLMB values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YOC.DE achieves a -40.18% return, which is significantly lower than CLMB's -5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, YOC.DE has underperformed CLMB with an annualized return of 8.63%, while CLMB has yielded a comparatively higher 20.92% annualized return.


YOC.DE

1D
1.56%
1M
-7.91%
YTD
-40.18%
6M
-40.18%
1Y
-56.39%
3Y*
-18.40%
5Y*
-7.15%
10Y*
8.63%

CLMB

1D
4.94%
1M
23.74%
YTD
-5.49%
6M
-12.21%
1Y
-8.19%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
29.81%
10Y*
20.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YOC.DE vs. CLMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YOC.DE
YOC AG
-40.18%-33.54%9.33%13.21%-0.38%66.25%90.48%13.51%-55.32%130.03%
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
-5.49%-28.09%149.02%71.30%-2.60%102.57%12.07%74.76%-34.12%-18.44%

Correlation

The correlation between YOC.DE and CLMB is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YOC.DE vs. CLMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YOC.DE
YOC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
YOC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YOC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
YOC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
YOC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
YOC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

CLMB
CLMB Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CLMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLMB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CLMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YOC.DE vs. CLMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YOC AG (YOC.DE) and Climb Global Solutions (CLMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YOC.DECLMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.02

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

-0.15

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

-0.32

-1.10

YOC.DE vs. CLMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YOC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.95, which is lower than the CLMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YOC.DE and CLMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YOC.DECLMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.95

-0.16

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.65

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.51

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.40

-0.48

Drawdowns

YOC.DE vs. CLMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YOC.DE drawdown since its inception was -98.44%, which is greater than CLMB's maximum drawdown of -62.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOC.DE and CLMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YOC.DECLMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.44%

-62.27%

-36.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.90%

-53.48%

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.39%

-57.39%

-19.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.39%

-57.39%

-19.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.39%

-57.39%

-19.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.84%

-38.02%

-46.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.49%

-20.80%

-45.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.77%

25.54%

+14.23%

Volatility

YOC.DE vs. CLMB - Volatility Comparison

YOC AG (YOC.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) at 10.78%. This indicates that YOC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YOC.DECLMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.73%

10.78%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.14%

41.16%

+12.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.50%

52.32%

+7.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.80%

46.16%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.33%

41.45%

+11.88%

Dividends

YOC.DE vs. CLMB - Dividend Comparison

YOC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLMB
Climb Global Solutions
0.36%0.66%0.67%1.24%2.16%1.94%3.56%4.20%6.80%4.07%3.64%3.71%
YOC.DE
YOC AG
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

YOC.DE vs. CLMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between YOC AG and Climb Global Solutions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. YOC.DE values in EUR, CLMB values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


YOC.DE and CLMB have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YOC.DE and CLMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer