YMM vs. GMAB
YMM (Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd.) and GMAB (Genmab A/S) are both stocks. YMM operates in Software - Application (Technology), while GMAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, YMM returned 14.68%/yr vs -15.49%/yr for GMAB. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
YMM vs. GMAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMM achieves a -14.41% return, which is significantly higher than GMAB's -22.47% return.
YMM
- 1D
- -4.42%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- -14.41%
- 6M
- -18.87%
- 1Y
- -21.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMAB
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -11.69%
- YTD
- -22.47%
- 6M
- -24.62%
- 1Y
- 11.85%
- 3Y*
- -15.49%
- 5Y*
- -10.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
YMM vs. GMAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | -14.41% | 0.79% | 57.39% | -12.38% | -4.42% | -61.07% |
GMAB Genmab A/S | -22.47% | 47.58% | -34.45% | -24.87% | 7.13% | -8.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between YMM and GMAB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
YMM:
$9.49B
GMAB:
$15.25B
YMM:
$3.93
GMAB:
$4.10
YMM:
2.31
GMAB:
5.83
YMM:
0.01
GMAB:
0.39
YMM:
0.76
GMAB:
1.72
YMM:
0.24
GMAB:
2.68
YMM:
$12.58B
GMAB:
$8.84B
YMM:
$7.94B
GMAB:
$8.27B
YMM:
$4.33B
GMAB:
$3.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YMM vs. GMAB — Risk / Return Rank
YMM
GMAB
YMM vs. GMAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM) and Genmab A/S (GMAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YMM | GMAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.09 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | 0.37 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | 0.85 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YMM | GMAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | 0.35 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | 0.26 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
YMM vs. GMAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMM drawdown since its inception was -78.37%, smaller than the maximum GMAB drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMM and GMAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMM | GMAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.37% | -84.20% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.92% | -32.51% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.92% | -57.44% | +15.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.73% | -50.99% | -4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.18% | -31.07% | -25.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.91% | 14.03% | +9.88% |
Volatility
YMM vs. GMAB - Volatility Comparison
Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (YMM) has a higher volatility of 14.07% compared to Genmab A/S (GMAB) at 11.99%. This indicates that YMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YMM | GMAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.07% | 11.99% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.23% | 25.15% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.66% | 34.23% | +5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.09% | 33.42% | +39.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.09% | 35.23% | +37.86% |
Dividends
YMM vs. GMAB - Dividend Comparison
YMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while GMAB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GMAB Genmab A/S | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YMM Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. | 1.98% | 1.79% | 1.33% |
Financials
YMM vs. GMAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. and Genmab A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
YMM vs. GMAB - Profitability Comparison
YMM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 2.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.
GMAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported a gross profit of 834.08M and revenue of 899.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.8%.
YMM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. reported an operating income of 983.93M and revenue of 2.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.8%.
GMAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported an operating income of 225.83M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
YMM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. reported a net income of 984.91M and revenue of 2.83B, resulting in a net margin of 34.8%.
GMAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
YMM and GMAB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YMM has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to GMAB (11.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMM dropped -78.37% vs GMAB's -84.20%.
GMAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YMM and GMAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer