PortfoliosLab logo
GMAB vs. CPRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GMAB and CPRX is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GMAB vs. CPRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genmab A/S (GMAB) and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CPRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

GMAB:

53.55%

CPRX:

59.23%

Max Drawdown

GMAB:

-10.16%

CPRX:

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

GMAB:

-10.16%

CPRX:

-3.83%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GMAB:

$12.12B

CPRX:

$2.85B

EPS

GMAB:

$1.84

CPRX:

$1.31

PE Ratio

GMAB:

10.52

CPRX:

17.84

PEG Ratio

GMAB:

1.02

CPRX:

0.00

PS Ratio

GMAB:

0.57

CPRX:

5.80

PB Ratio

GMAB:

15.00

CPRX:

3.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

GMAB:

$18.10B

CPRX:

$534.65M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GMAB:

$17.26B

CPRX:

$451.07M

EBITDA (TTM)

GMAB:

$6.35B

CPRX:

$177.46M

Returns By Period


GMAB

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CPRX

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GMAB vs. CPRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GMAB is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GMAB is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GMAB is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GMAB is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GMAB is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GMAB is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CPRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CPRX is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CPRX is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CPRX is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CPRX is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CPRX is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CPRX is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GMAB vs. CPRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genmab A/S (GMAB) and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

GMAB vs. CPRX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GMAB nor CPRX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GMAB vs. CPRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GMAB drawdown since its inception was -10.16%, which is greater than CPRX's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMAB and CPRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GMAB vs. CPRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

GMAB vs. CPRX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Genmab A/S and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
715.00M
141.42M
(GMAB) Total Revenue
(CPRX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GMAB vs. CPRX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Genmab A/S and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
94.1%
87.3%
(GMAB) Gross Margin
(CPRX) Gross Margin
GMAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Genmab A/S reported a gross profit of 673.00M and revenue of 715.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.1%.

CPRX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 123.51M and revenue of 141.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.3%.

GMAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Genmab A/S reported an operating income of 188.00M and revenue of 715.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.3%.

CPRX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 63.37M and revenue of 141.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.8%.

GMAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Genmab A/S reported a net income of 195.00M and revenue of 715.00M, resulting in a net margin of 27.3%.

CPRX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 56.74M and revenue of 141.42M, resulting in a net margin of 40.1%.