YMAX vs. QQA
YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YMAX returned 9.02% vs 32.22% for QQA. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YMAX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
YMAX vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.57% return.
YMAX
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 6.76%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- 9.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 32.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAX vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs | 6.06% | 6.04% | 8.33% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.57% | 17.24% | 7.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between YMAX and QQA is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between YMAX and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
YMAX vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YMAX
QQA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
YMAX
QQA
Financial Services
YMAX
QQA
Communication Services
YMAX
QQA
Consumer Cyclical
YMAX
QQA
Basic Materials
YMAX
QQA
Industrials
YMAX
QQA
Consumer Defensive
YMAX
QQA
Healthcare
YMAX
QQA
Utilities
YMAX
QQA
Energy
YMAX
QQA
Real Estate
YMAX
QQA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YMAX vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
YMAX
QQA
YMAX vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YMAX | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.46 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 3.70 | -3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.82 | 16.59 | -15.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YMAX | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 2.57 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 1.18 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
YMAX vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than QQA's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMAX | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -19.73% | -6.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.13% | -8.76% | -17.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.98% | -0.10% | -5.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -2.44% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.99% | 1.95% | +9.04% |
Volatility
YMAX vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) at 2.91%. This indicates that YMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YMAX | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 2.91% | +3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.10% | 9.68% | +7.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 12.59% | +9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 18.27% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 18.27% | +4.70% |
YMAX vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
YMAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
YMAX vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 72.94%, more than QQA's 9.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.29% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs | 72.94% | 78.70% | 44.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YMAX and QQA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YMAX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to QQA (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAX dropped -26.13% vs QQA's -19.73%.
On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 32.22% vs 9.02% for YMAX. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QQA has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.
YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 72.94%, compared with 9.29% for QQA.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAX and 0.29% for QQA.
QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YMAX and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer