PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAX vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAX vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 176.01% return.


YMAX

1D
-2.10%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
0.77%
6M
-1.20%
1Y
2.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
-7.20%
1M
12.58%
YTD
176.01%
6M
174.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAX vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YMAX and AMDW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.60

YMAX vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YMAX
AMDW

Technology

63.7%
27.8%

Financial Services

12.7%

-

Communication Services

7.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Healthcare

2.0%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Utilities

0.3%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

YMAX
63.7%
AMDW
27.8%

Financial Services

YMAX
12.7%
AMDW

-

Communication Services

YMAX
7.6%
AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

YMAX
6.2%
AMDW

-

Industrials

YMAX
2.8%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

YMAX
2.0%
AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

YMAX
2.0%
AMDW

-

Healthcare

YMAX
2.0%
AMDW

-

Energy

YMAX
0.5%
AMDW

-

Utilities

YMAX
0.3%
AMDW

-

Real Estate

YMAX
0.1%
AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAX vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAX vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YMAXAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

YMAX vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YMAX vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAXAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

-34.64%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.66%

-7.20%

-3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.40%

-14.25%

+7.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.24%

Volatility

YMAX vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAXAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.56%

83.41%

-59.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.61%

83.41%

-59.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.61%

83.41%

-59.80%

YMAX vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAX vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.01%, more than AMDW's 37.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
37.14%34.78%0.00%
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
74.01%78.70%44.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAX and AMDW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 74.01%, compared with 37.14% for AMDW.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAX and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAX and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer