PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAX vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAX vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 150.89% return.


YMAX

1D
1.76%
1M
-1.93%
6M
5.27%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
-2.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.68%

AMDW

1D
1.68%
1M
-8.62%
6M
113.70%
YTD
150.89%
1Y
214.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
231.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.29M$9.36M$8.60M
$9.31M$11.31M$14.54M

YMAX vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YMAX and AMDW is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.60

The correlation between YMAX and AMDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

YMAX vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YMAX
AMDW

Technology

61.0%
19.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%

-

Communication Services

7.2%

-

Financial Services

5.5%

-

Industrials

5.4%

-

Healthcare

5.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Energy

1.3%

-

Utilities

0.6%

-

Technology

YMAX
61.0%
AMDW
19.3%

Consumer Cyclical

YMAX
7.6%
AMDW

-

Communication Services

YMAX
7.2%
AMDW

-

Financial Services

YMAX
5.5%
AMDW

-

Industrials

YMAX
5.4%
AMDW

-

Healthcare

YMAX
5.1%
AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

YMAX
3.0%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

YMAX
1.8%
AMDW

-

Real Estate

YMAX
1.6%
AMDW

-

Energy

YMAX
1.3%
AMDW

-

Utilities

YMAX
0.6%
AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAX vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW
AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YMAX vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YMAXAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.37

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

6.23

-6.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

12.22

-12.43

YMAX vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the AMDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAX and AMDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YMAX vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAXAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

-34.64%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.13%

-34.64%

+8.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.75%

-20.07%

+9.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

-13.99%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

17.63%

-5.91%

Volatility

YMAX vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) is 6.62%, while Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) has a volatility of 28.57%. This indicates that YMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAXAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

28.57%

-21.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.20%

66.95%

-46.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.15%

85.77%

-61.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.51%

84.89%

-61.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

84.89%

-61.38%

YMAX vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAX vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.74%, more than AMDW's 55.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
55.51%34.78%0.00%
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
71.74%78.70%44.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAX and AMDW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDW has higher volatility (28.57%) compared to YMAX (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAX dropped -26.13% vs AMDW's -34.64%.

On 1-year performance, AMDW leads with 214.50% vs -2.39% for YMAX. On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAX has been the lower-risk option at 6.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDW has performed better with a 214.50% return vs -2.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for YMAX.

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 71.74%, compared with 55.51% for AMDW.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.33% for YMAX and 0.99% for AMDW.

AMDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAX and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer