PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAR vs. FFEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YMAR vs. FFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YMAR vs. FFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
YMAR
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March
1.24%18.55%3.12%16.31%-8.46%3.24%
FFEB
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February
-1.36%13.76%16.64%19.95%-7.51%12.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAR achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than FFEB's -1.36% return.


YMAR

1D
1.61%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
1.24%
6M
4.17%
1Y
14.11%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*

FFEB

1D
1.97%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
1.28%
1Y
14.47%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YMAR vs. FFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAR has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FFEB's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YMAR vs. FFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAR
YMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
YMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FFEB
FFEB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAR vs. FFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YMARFFEBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

1.17

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

1.76

+0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.72

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.19

9.15

+4.03

YMAR vs. FFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the FFEB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAR and FFEB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YMARFFEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.17

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.92

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.77

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between YMAR and FFEB is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

YMAR vs. FFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither YMAR nor FFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

YMAR vs. FFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAR drawdown since its inception was -22.60%, roughly equal to the maximum FFEB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAR and FFEB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YMARFFEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.60%

-22.81%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.66%

-8.65%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.60%

-13.85%

-8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-3.87%

+2.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-2.46%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

1.62%

-0.59%

Volatility

YMAR vs. FFEB - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (YMAR) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YMARFFEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

3.72%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.91%

5.65%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.25%

12.39%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.37%

10.88%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.35%

13.90%

-2.55%