FFEB vs. FEBT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT).

FFEB and FEBT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFEB is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Feb 21, 2020. FEBT is an actively managed fund by Allianz. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023.

Performance

FFEB vs. FEBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FFEB vs. FEBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February	-1.36%	13.76%	16.64%	15.76%
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	-1.69%	12.72%	17.29%	14.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFEB achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly higher than FEBT's -1.69% return.

FFEB

• 1D: 1.97%
• 1M: -3.34%
• YTD: -1.36%
• 6M: 1.28%
• 1Y: 14.47%
• 3Y*: 14.32%
• 5Y*: 9.99%
• 10Y*: —

FEBT

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -3.34%
• YTD: -1.69%
• 6M: 1.12%
• 1Y: 14.62%
• 3Y*: 14.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFEB vs. FEBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FEBT's 0.74% expense ratio.

FFEB

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February

FEBT

Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF

Return for Risk

FFEB vs. FEBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFEB

FFEB Risk / Return Rank: 73
FFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FEBT

FEBT Risk / Return Rank: 70
FEBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FEBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FEBT Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FEBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FEBT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFEB vs. FEBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFEB	FEBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.17	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	1.76	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.28	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.72	1.70	+0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.15	8.88	+0.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFEB vs. FEBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the FEBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFEB and FEBT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFEB	FEBT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	1.17	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	1.37	-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between FFEB and FEBT is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FFEB vs. FEBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FFEB nor FEBT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%

Drawdowns

FFEB vs. FEBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFEB drawdown since its inception was -22.81%, which is greater than FEBT's maximum drawdown of -13.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEB and FEBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFEB	FEBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.81%	-13.19%	-9.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-8.86%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.87%	-4.13%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-1.22%	-1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.62%	1.70%	-0.08%

Volatility

FFEB vs. FEBT - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February (FFEB) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFEB	FEBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	3.88%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.65%	6.11%	-0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	12.59%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.88%	9.88%	+1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	9.88%	+4.02%